autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Stock class for Firehawk

To: "'richj50@bit-net.com'" <richj50@bit-net.com>,
Subject: RE: Stock class for Firehawk
From: "Stevens, Kevin" <kstevens@ventritex.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 13:14:02 -0800
I know it's not a direct response to your (quite valid) question, but isn't
it a moot point?  Why would you prefer to run in SS rather than ESP?

KeS

> -----Original Message-----
> From: richj50@bit-net.com [SMTP:richj50@bit-net.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 1999 11:26 AM
> To:   Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
> Cc:   autox@autox.team.net
> Subject:      Re: Stock class for Firehawk
> 
> On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com wrote:
> > 
> > The Firehawk is specifically excluded from stock.  1999 rule book, page
> > 142.
> 
> Okay, that sounds pretty definitive.  Any particular reason why it should
> be classed separately from the Camaro SS?  They both have the same
> options, both are ordered under standard GM option codes and both are
> modified at SLP.  Why should one be in SS (or ESP) and the other only in
> ESP?
> 
> Rich Johnston
> 95 Z28 ESP
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>