autox-cm
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fuel Acquisition Port required by GCR

To: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@qwest.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel Acquisition Port required by GCR
From: "Bill Engle, Sr." <whesr@iglou.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:39:05 -0400
That is right out of the NHRA rule book.  They do a lot of fuel checks.

Bill Engle, Sr.

Sam & Greg Scharnberg wrote:
> 
> All of the discussion of the GCR and FCS has prompted me to spend some time
> reading.  I found the GCR interesting but the plot was difficult to follow.
> :-)
> 
> Anyway, I ran across 17.4.2 in the GCR and it appears to me that we may be
> required to add a fuel acquisition port on any vehicle governed by the GCR.
>  This would include BM, CM, and FM.  Probably prepared also but I have
> given up trying to follow prepared rules.
> 
> I plan to ask the SEB to add this to the exceptions under Solo II rule 16.3
> for next year since BM uses last years GCR.  I think that requiring BM
> vehicles to add this port in 2002 increases costs, adds complexity, serves
> no purpose, and would be really dumb!  (If the SEB elects not to add this
> exception, I would probably ignore it anyway since disconnecting a fuel
> line MAY be considered acceptable. :-)
> 
> My question for the CM group is if you want me to add CM to my letter since
> it already effects your class.
> 
> Yours for the sport.
> 
> Greg Scharnberg
> (old and slow, but havin fun)

///
///  autox-cm@autox.team.net mailing list
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>