The Narbys wrote:
> In my case, a functioning reverse is present, but the linkage is
> adjusted in a way that it won't engage - to avoid scraping my
> knuckles on the bodywork when shifting to 3rd...or does "not
> reachable"="not functional"?
A maladjusted linkage (whether deliberate or not) doesn't bother
me nearly as much as the opportunity to use a custom gearbox.
Of course, that opportunity already exists, but at least it has to
have reverse.
Why is this being proposed? What is the supposed advantage?
Mark
///
/// autox-cm@autox.team.net mailing list
///
|