alpines
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Re: Alpine 4 branch manifold]

To: TIGEROOTES@aol.com, alpines@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Re: Alpine 4 branch manifold]
From: Jan Eyerman <jan.eyerman@usa.net>
Date: 5 Jan 2001 14:26:47 EST
Jim,

You may have more direct experience on this, but I thought that the length of
the pipes determine at what RPM the scavanging occurs. The gain decreases the
further away you get from the "designed" RPM.  It is possible that two pipes
might give better performance at low RPM and possibly at the middle ranges,
but be notably less at higher RPM.  

Jan




TIGEROOTES@aol.com wrote:
Joe,
    If you are contemplating dual-exhaust on an Alpine with two pipes 
replacing the existing exhaust collector, you will drop your power output 
considerably.  
    As each of four exhaust pulses (per cycle) enters the collector and 
continues down the single pipe (you currently have), each of these pulses 
cause a negative pressure to exist behind them, and they help to draw the 
next cylinders' exhaust pulse away from the engine: this is called exhaust 
scavenging.  
    There is a partial vacuum (negative pressure) present at your exhaust 
manifold or header due to scavenging, and this helps draw more fuel into the 
combustion chambers while both valves are open during their period of 
overlap, or as Isky calls it "the 5th cycle".  
    Secondly, you will not develop a high enough temperature to chase away 
humidity in either side of your new exhaust systems, and they will rust away 
quickly.  Because the temperature is so low, the density of the exhaust 
gasses climbs quickly, and their velocities drop, again reducing scavenging.
Jim Leach   Pacific Tiger Club  Seattle

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Re: Alpine 4 branch manifold], Jan Eyerman <=