To: | 6Pack List <6pack@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [6pack] TR5 and TR250 |
From: | Mark J Bradakis <mark@bradakis.com> |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:12:13 -0700 |
Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | 6pack@autox.team.net |
References: | <3EC02700-AD32-40F2-A3B1-4435B2CFE349@comcast.net> <1358367354.66930.YahooMailClassic@web142703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1358372076.74582.YahooMailNeo@web163505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1358447308.89445.YahooMailNeo@web163501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1D261D88-AF06-4CA3-A25C-22AC516DF6C4@comcast.net> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120315 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8 |
Ashford Little wrote: > Hmm, which brings up another question to the uninformed (me). How did > the PI system meter fuel? Or why was it the higher altitudes caused > issues? Obviously the air gets thinner, and it didn't compensate, so > what did the PI lack that the carbs had to compensate for altitude? It was simple mechanical injection - the same dose of fuel regardless of barometric pressure. So as the air got thinner, with less and less oxygen, the air fuel ratio gets screwed up. The constant depression type carbs like SUs and Strombergs would not raise the pistons as much in thinner air, which limited the amount of fuel getting mixed in, so they dealt with altitude changes more readily than simple PI. mjb. ________________________________________ 6pack@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/6pack/mharc@autox.team.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [6pack] TR5 and TR250, Tr6uo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [6pack] TR5 and TR250, John Cyganowski |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [6pack] TR5 and TR250, Tr6uo |
Next by Thread: | [6pack] TR5 and TR250, John Cyganowski |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |