6pack
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [6pack] Problem.

To: "'Robert N. Clark'" <rclark@robertsonclark.com>,
Subject: Re: [6pack] Problem.
From: "Brits'n'Pieces \(Eric Frenken\)" <lists@brits-n-pieces.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:43:44 +0100
Well said, Bob. And you judges, I bet you all have bought one or another
Chinese copied stuff although there was an original item (more pricey)
available. Come to think about that.

Eric
Heinsberg/Germany

-----Original Message-----
From: 6pack-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:6pack-bounces@autox.team.net] On
Behalf Of Robert N. Clark
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 12:00 AM
To: forzion@maine.rr.com; David B Johnson
Cc: 6pack@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [6pack] Problem.

What if John's is better, or easier to install? Or maybe Steve's is better
and this whole discussion isn't necessary.  I don't think one solution to a
problem should foreclose further consideration of it.
We'd still be making tools out of bone it that were the case.

We should all be supportive of those who take the time and effort to be
innovative but when new ideas or new versions of old ideas are suggested, we
should ask questions about whether its actually better or not.  I see on
Bob's website on this issue there a number of suggested remedies but he
likes the delrin option the best.  Why not ask John why his is better?

Bob Clark


John;

You apparently have time to make copies of other people's part, including
Art Lipp's and Patton Machine products. What the sense and where's the
ethics of THAT? Before you decide to "create" an item, check to see if
anyone's already making it. If there is, don't copy it! Simple, no?

Dave
_______________________________________________

Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html

6pack@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/6pack

http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>