I personally like the plastic replacements better. I pulled a fiberglass
cover off my tr250. Didn't fit very well & much harder to "manipulate".
Maybe I just had a bad one?? The plastic cover, available from big 3 among
others, fits very well. Can't comment on the sound characteristics.
My 2 cents,
Todd
68tr250
74tr6...on my way to the TRials
From: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>
Reply-To: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>
To: "Douglas Morris" <dcmdcm@earthlink.net>, <6pack@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: Trans Tunnel Cover Replacement Reco
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:33:23 -0700
Doug:
I would suggest that you avoid fiberglass in favor of a polyethylene or
polypropylene replacement. They have better noise control characteristics,
although
the stiffness and weight of fiberglass are also desirable.
Cheers,
Vance
-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas Morris [mailto:dcmdcm@earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:41 AM
To: 6pack@autox.team.net
Subject: Trans Tunnel Cover Replacement Reco
I'm doing a tradeoff on the cost of duct tape vs replacing a trans tunnel
cover.
Question: Is there any significant difference between the choices of tunnel
cover replacements (durability/fit/cost/ease-of-installation/etc.)? Mainly,
I want to avoid a bad choice.
DougM (NC, newbie)
'74 TR6 CF18310OU
_________________________________________________________________
Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0!
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoticon
|