To: | <dmallin@attglobal.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: TR250 Valve lift and Rocker ratio lift vs cam lift |
From: | Shane Ingate <madmax_xx@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 05 Dec 2002 11:00:19 -0500 |
Don Malling wrote: > Is there any problem with 1.65:1 rockers assuming I get the "right" cam. The way it has been explained to me is that the higher ratio 1.65:1 rockers and well-selected cam will give you that extra 0.1 sec per lap, at the expense of increased wear on your cam lobe, relative to an equivalently-well selected 1.55:1 RR and cam. So yeah, if you *need* to win that race, and don9t mind going through the motor every year, you *need* the higher ratio. Good post, Don. Shane Ingate in Maryland (where we have 8" of snow on the ground) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Re:TR6 performance (current list), Michael Lupynec |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Fwd: Re: TR-6 performance (Q&A), Timothy Holbrook |
Previous by Thread: | TR250 Valve lift and Rocker ratio lift vs cam lift, Don Malling |
Next by Thread: | #4) Why will roller rockers of an equal ratio open the valves, Marc Nederkoorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |