While the vehicle is way different (1989 Winnebago on an E350 Chassis) we
found that pinched lines to/from the charcoal canister made the engine very
difficult to start. I really agree with Bud on getting the lines right.
Steve
1972 TR6 (it runs :)now )
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-6pack@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-6pack@autox.team.net]On
Behalf Of levilevi
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:28 PM
To: Hugh Fader; '6pack'; 'triumphs'
Cc: Nelson@buckeyetriumphs.org
Subject: Re: Zenith Stromberg 175CD-2SE vs. 175CD-2SEV
Hugh,
If you don't need to get an emissions test then you can cap the ports for
the float chambers or vent them. You might have a difficult time passing
an emissions test with the ports not connected properly and without the
hoses from the carbon cannister to the carbs connected. A friend was having
problems getting his CO levels below the standard until we hooked everything
up as it should be. The theory was that the needles were setup for the air
drawn from the cannister and the cannister flow was affected by the draw
from the ports. Don't know exactly what it was but he easily got the CO
below the standards with all hoses connected (he had a three hole cannister
which is what is needed for the carbs with ports for the fuel chamber). I
think that was a 1973-76 carb feature.
Good Luck.
Bud Rolofson
71TR6 CC57365 (Good 6)
66TR4A CTC57806 (The Wreck-Almost Parts)
66TR4A CTC57529 (The Project)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hugh Fader" <hfader@usa.net>
To: "'6pack'" <6pack@autox.team.net>; "'triumphs'" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Cc: <Nelson@BuckeyeTriumphs.org>
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 8:32 PM
Subject: Zenith Stromberg 175CD-2SE vs. 175CD-2SEV
> Hello.
>
> I disassembled one of my spare carbs today. Some may remember I plan to
> rebuild these in my leisure while running the originals on the car. I have
> identified the spare set as Zenith Stromberg 175CD-2SEV. These are
diferent
> from the stock 1972 175CD-2SE carbs in that they have a Float Chamber
> Emissions Port (many thanks AGAIN Nelson).
>
> I am leery of emissions add-ons and troubles they may cause. Is there any
> particular reason I should prefer using the original carbs without the
float
> chamber emissions port? I notice from Nelson's writeup that this is port
is
> vented to the charcoal canister. I can't see how. My existing carbs only
> draw from the canister which I have disabled anyway because it seemed to
> have a vacuum leak. How would I handle this? Can I vent them to atmosphere
> or disable them?
>
> Thanks,
> Hugh Fader
|